Flat Earth Flight Patterns


“If the earth is flat, trans Pacific flights from California to Australia should be impossible/much longer.”


The above question presupposes its own answer: round earth. It does not even consider the possibility that the earth IS Flat, and that flight times reflect that reality. Flight times take precisely the amount of time they do, because the earth is Flat. If we existed on a spherical earth, traveling from California to Australia would take way less time:

Flat earth pacific

If the earth were round, distances between any two points would become significantly smaller. However, given the fact that it is Flat, flight times take much longer:

flight path pacific

As can be seen, the distances between points on a Flat Earth are greater. These distances reflect the 15hr 30 minute flight time between California and Australia. If the earth were condensed into a spherical shape, not only would the earth’s surface area be smaller, all flights would take way less time.

Long flight times reflect a Planar Earth.

13 thoughts on “Flat Earth Flight Patterns

  1. Pingback: Evidence | Flat Earth & Thought

  2. Wtf lol you didn’t even answer the question. Your logic makes no sense, even with a round earth the distance is still 5,000 miles. You didn’t even address the question. Fuuuuuuuuuuuck


      • Where is your evidence they are fake? More specifically, where is your evidence the Himawari-8 satellite which takes a picture of the Earth every 10 minutes is providing faked images?

        I don’t expect a legitimate answer other than “it looks fake” which is all your side can ever say.


    • When did you go up to that height to see the whole globe earth and if you did, did you photograph the whole globe and be able to provide an actual photo, not a man created image.


  3. It takes 14 hours to get to Australia from California on a round earth. And if you would like me to prove gravity exists drop a pencil from everywhere in the world. Stupid Flat earthers


  4. When did you decide that scientific proof was based on one data point? You need to be able to apply your theory repeatedly for all scenarios for it to be accepted. Sydney to Los Angeles is conveniently selected as both flat and heliocentric models yield similar distances. What you should do is take the following flight times and create a physical model with a length of string proportionally representing the flight times and actually see what shape it creates.
    Perth Jo-Burg 11
    Perth Sydney 4
    Sydney Auckland 3
    Auckland Santiago 11

    London New York 7
    NY Los Angeles 5
    LA Tokyo 11
    Tokyo Dubai 10
    Dubai London 8

    London Jo-burg 11
    Tokyo Sydney 9
    LA Santiago 9
    Perth Dubai 9

    When you’ve done this and you’re still not convinced, try understanding the path of the Sun….We should agree that there are 360 degrees in a circle (if by nothing else by definition) and that there are (approximately) 24 hours in a day. This means that the Sun moves through the sky at (approximately) 15 degrees per hour. You can test this out yourself. This ONLY works with a spinning globe heliocentrix model….just try mapping the movement of the Sun every hour (at more than one location, try, for example Sydney and London) and see if the same observation is true (it won’t).


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s